I
SO
WANTED TO LIKE HER. What it is to be old and soft. I had thought
that maybe Michelle was the silver lining of this abominable
administration, that her duties as First Lady were exposing her to a
real America that refuted her Princeton fantasy of an evil slave state.
I guess I was wrong
about that. Read the whole thing.
The
very
angry first lady
Michelle’s back, and she’s madder than ever. She was already pretty
angry, seemingly unhappy with just about everything. As her husband
wrapped up the Democratic nomination in 2008, she let fly her real
feelings: “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of
my country.” A few months into her job as first lady, her French
counterpart asked how she liked the gig: “Don’t ask!” she reportedly
spat. “It’s hell. I can’t stand it!”
She even seems to be mad at her silver-tongued husband. When the two
were to set off on a luxurious 10-day vacation to Martha’s Vineyard,
she left early - four hours early - and flew up alone. And those
private vacations. She’s traveled to some of the world’s most plush
resorts, taking 42 days off in the past year - that’d be eight weeks of
vacay time if she held down a normal job.
Now, she is ready to spew her bilious disgust with America on the
campaign trail. A dignified, transcendent first lady? No chance.
Michelle is going to break with a hundred years of tradition and play
the role of attack dog, heaping derision on her husband’s political
opponents like no other first lady before her.
And it’s already begun. Mad Michelle this week popped down to Davis
Island, Fla., to hobnob with the very people her husband despises - the
1 percent. At a massive mansion on the bay, filled with the wealthiest
of the wealthy, America’s first lady launched into a tirade about
“them” - the Republicans.
“Let’s not forget about what it meant when my husband appointed two
brilliant Supreme Court justices, and for the first time in history,
our daughters - and our sons - watched three women take their seats on
our nation’s highest court. But more importantly, let’s not forget the
impact their decisions will have on our lives for decades to come - on
our privacy and our security, on whether we can speak freely, worship
openly and love whomever we choose. That is what’s at stake here,” she
said to applause.
Yes, Republicans hope to regain the White House so they can install
Supreme Court justices who will trample Americans’ privacy, ignore the
nation’s security, crush free speech and persecute the religious...
This is the person Barack Obama goes home to. It makes me more worried
than ever.
WE
HAVE FUN. I've been away from the site for more than a few days,
which doesn't normally occur, and I feel obliged to offer an
explanation to assure you it's not going to be a trend.
Lady Laird and I have been to Pittsburgh for a long weekend. We were on
a mission. Our granddaughter Pippa attends college there and it became
necessary for us to say "Hi, Andy" to a portrait of Andrew Mellon
so his ghost wouldn't trip her when she passed through the lobby of the
administration building on her way to class. All the underclassmen
swear this is a constant threat.
We were happy to assist. My helpmeet made the hotel reservations,
arranged for the rental vehicle, scoped out the route via the GPS
function on her iPhone, and conducted the intense negotiations required
to get a veterinary clinic to house all three of our dogs for nigh on
72 hours. (People think Hillary is a tough bargainer. At the end they
weren't even surly when they agreed to the king's ransom times two she
had kept as her diplomatic ace in the hole.)
I did my part as well. I fell ill with a severe respiratory complaint
that should have made it impossible to leave my computer for any reason
whatsoever, barring the noble altruism of a man who also prefers not to
live in total spousal silence for the next three months, and when
tears, tantrums, special pleadings, and brilliantly ingenious excuses
by the dozen availed nought, I went out to the TrueValue and purchased
two timers to fool the burglars prepared to pounce on our house when
the sighthounds and I were no longer sleeping on our sentinel couches.
Then I somehow managed to extract the high tech timer devices from
their senior-proof packaging and, with the aid of my immense intellect
and a magnifying glass, deciphered the instructions on their
installation and activation. Several false starts later, they actually
worked. You know. Man stuff.
It's easy for you youngsters to say, "So what? You got in a car, drove
there and back, and now you want a medal?" Of course I want a medal.
This one will do:
With an "Escape"
cluster
and a "Hi, Andy" chevron.
You have no idea what it's like for a civilized homebody to burst
suddenly out of his small world into the wild west that exists slightly
left of the Main Line. There be horses and buggies out yonder,
starting as early as the Lancaster exit of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Amishers. At every mile marker
afterward you wonder, will the roads be paved? Will we fall headfirst
into a godawful Kevin Costner movie involving deerskins and subliminal
native symbols?
Thus, Friday morning found me piloting a bright red Ford Escape stuffed
with dogs and luggage to the first checkpoint, where Lady Laird began
the intricate process of canine-ransom exchange by leading a 13-pound
pug into the office of the commissar, who like all communist
apparatchiks everywhere, had no record of the intended transaction and
needed all new paperwork. When she returned, hours later, to give me
the okay to bring the other two, I was filled with admiration -- until
I beheld the face of the functionary in charge when she saw a greyhound
and a deerhound.
"I thought you meant three pugs," she said. "This changes everything."
To this day, people -- generally younger, dumber people -- ask me why I
hang onto my grandfather's WWI .45 sidearm and why I added the 16-bullet clip. What can you say to such
people? The dogs got their due digs.
Then the great odyssey got truly underway. I drove all 12,000 miles of
it, because the alternative would have been to surrender the steering
wheel to women who were fighting over which channel of eighties music
was going to prevail on the radio until we fell off the western edge of
the earth. No thank you. And, yes, there was more than one woman on
board. Do you begin to understand my medal claim?
I know I've tested your narrative patience past its limit. Permit me to
share the observations of a couch potato dynamited out of his happy
zone into the realities of life on the 21st century road. The following
are non sequiturs, but I'm convinced that epigrammatists like Pascal
and La Rochefoucauld would approve, perhaps even with some envy:
Why do they call it the Ford "Escape"?
You can't get away from a bleak and barren landscape. Somebody said,
during the 6,000 miles of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, "I love it. This
looks just like Canada." All I could think was, "Exactly. Why I never
go there. Eighty billion square miles of barren nothingness. And no way
out."
I'd like to (want to) buy a Ford. But I don't. I grew up in the days
when we fell in love with cars. Nobody falls in love with a thing that
aims for passing grades and achieves exactly that. The kindest thing I
can say is that I didn't get a back-ache. Probably not what Romeo said
about Juliet.
There's nothing like an old, small, women-only college. Too bad the
[redacted] academics have to [redacted] it up with [redacted] [redacted]
like [redacted], [redacted], [redacted], and especially [redacted],
which actually makes me [redacted]. But the campus, the buildings, and
the trees and gardens were astonishingly beautiful. These alone make me
hopeful. The warm light of the past may yet outshine the politically
correct haz-mat lightbulbs of the present.
If you're a couple who loves the Olive Garden, like Lady Laird and me, you don't have to wait in line for a great
meal. You can wait for two seats to open up at the bar and eat
there. The menu is the same, the service is swift, and you feel like
you've won the lottery. Kewl.
In the hands of a master (er, missus), the iPhone can do anything. Find
the way to the hotel, find the weather back home, remind you not to
call the pet gulag to check on Eloise, and tell you where the nearest
restaurant is that's serving food in a snowstorm when your own hotel
keeps boutique hours for continental breakfast and early supper.
Granddaughters are lovely, touching beings. You want to protect them
from all the things that would enable them to have adult human
conversations with you. And when they've finally suffered enough to have adult human conversations
with, you wish -- like a maiden aunt fixated on Tinkerbelle -- that
they might remember all the way back to who they were then and unravel
some of its mystery for you.
McDonald's does a pretty good job with its Bacon, Egg & Cheese
Bagel. I'm old enough to have some authority on this point. But it's
pernicious the way they put the loose change on top of the bills and
the slippery receipt. And evil the way they say "Sorry" when it cascades to
the pavement after your one-handed balancing act fails.
Starbucks has entirely ruined the coffee industry. Even on the Turnpike
you can't get a plain cup of coffee that isn't overpriced, overcooked,
syrupy with yuppie pretension, and not (no way) drinkable to the end of
a good cigarette.
Pittsburgh is a fine fine city. Like so many American cities are.
Unique in history, architecture, cultural riches (Pippa has already
studied Faberge treaures at the Frick), neighborhoods, and ethnic
identity. I love this country. Wherever you go, there is beauty, stores
of knowledge and art, and the people make you welcome and proud to be
American. Even in the appalling moral cesspool that is the headquarters
of Stiller (Steeler) fans.
The ghost of Andy can be placated with a certain firmness. I did so,
protecting Pippa in her hour of need and narrowly averting a tripping
incident with my lefthanded wife as she was taking his photograph, she
who sometimes trips even in the absence of a starchy autocrat wraith.
The secret? I didn't say, "Hi, Andy." I said, "How do you do, Andrew.
You look exactly like my own holier-than-thou great-grandfather. Be a
gentlemen to the women of of my family or I'll horsewhip you on the
steps of your club." He didn't say a word. The carpet edge reaching for
my wife's shoe summarily retreated. Breeding will tell.
If you ever do suddenly leave home, you won't get away with it
scot-free. For example, you could take a nice fall trip to see the
pretty leaves and learn on the news channels that your home has been
instantaneously inundated with a monstrous snowstorm that has plunged
your friends and neighbors into darkness. When this happens to you,
remember not to panic while you're panicking and putting cold cloths on
your head and texting all the people who don't have electricity anyway.
It's pretty much the way life is. Get used to it.
Even seniors can survive road trips. We're home. The house is fine,
thanks to my timers. The cats survived their three day Cat Party. The
dogs are home. (Molly has stopped shaking.) The Ford has escaped
back to Hertz. And all is right with the world.
No way I'm not feeling proud of myself. This morning, just one day
after the 18,000 mile round-trip, I superintended the return of
electrical power to our
manse (well, I woke up when the lights came back on), then I organized and managed the return of the Escape, the
rescue of the dogs, and the replacement of a flat tire on Lady Laird's
chariot of fire.
I confidently await the awarding of my medal. Because I'm an old-fashioned hero, nothing if not a legend in his own mind. And after a weekend of higher learning, I'm sold on the self-esteem
thing. Bring it on. Back on my couch, I'm entirely comfortable with the
idea of being celebrated just for showing up. Maybe it's the progessive
in me.
Or maybe I already have my medal. Pippa hugged me when we left and Lady Laird
laughed when I read her this post. She's already planning a repeat
trip next year. I'm not afraid. I'll drive the whole 24,000 miles. Man
stuff.
Step up your game,
Cain.
DON'T
CLOSE YOUR EYES. Deja deja
vue. Haven't we been here before? Now it's the Democrats who are
concerned about politicians who hit on women. Excuse me, the media.
Excuse me again, same thing.
Wouldn't bother with this at all, except to point out that we dealt
with it nearly a decade ago at Shuteye
Nation. Point? The question is old as the hills and interesting
only in its salacious details. Even women are bored by the so-called
news that prominent men are inclined to hit on attractive younger
women. Does the name Bill Clinton ring a bell? Aren't we past the whole
"lying about sex" wheeze?
Of course we are. Unless he's a Republican. Or one of those negroes who
can't keep his thing in his pants. Or he says something exciting and
then keeps his thing in his pants. Which upsets liberal women in
particular, sometimes all the way to the Supreme Court. Unless he's
pro-choice. In which case, you know. Regardless, with the copletely
singular exception of Bill Clinton, no man who aspires to be president
can be a sexual rogue. Explanation? We'll get back to you on that by
and by.
In the interim, a flashback to Shuteye
Nation, Year 2000:
Smithtonian Magazine:
An OOPS*
Gallery Sampler
Presdent Woody Willson never removed his pince-nez,
but
he
relished the company of a young lady named Ebony Flame, who started
her Wishington career as a stenographer but soon graduated to taxi
dancing.
When the Presdent caught sight of her ankle as she was trying to hail a
bus near the Capitol Building, he was instantly smitten. The Society
arranged
many 'propinquities' between Woody and Ebony during his two terms,
until
the Presdent's illness and general decline at the end of his second
term
called a halt to pleasure. As required under Society by-laws, Ebony
recorded
details of their meetings in the OOPS journal, which may be published
by Smithtonian at a later date, provided that necessary funding
can
be procured (preferably through the National Archives, but if need be,
via executive order). One racy
tidbit may serve to tantalize: Willson's pet name for Ebony was "my
stark
naked strumpet."
FDR liked them young, according to Society
archivist
Destiny LaTour. He also liked them short-haired, boyish in figure, and
"dressed to the nines in a birthday suit." There are four portraits of
Ameria's longest serving Presdent in the OOPS Gallery, one for each of
his terms, although Ms. LaTour makes it plain there were many more than
four women involved in Franklin
Rosevelt's "propinquities." Even at the end of his life, when he
could
barely utter a coherent sentence, he was still calling on the Society
twice
a week or more for company. The young
lady
shown above is Amber Borgia, an Ittalian by birth, who visited the Oval
Office on many occasions during the first term, but returned to her
native
land for political reasons when relations became strained between the
U.S.
and Benito Mussoloni, Ittaly's fascist
dictator. Her entries in the Society Journal are in Ittalian, but
according
to Ms. LaTour, that's not all that's exotic about them.
James K. Poke was Presdent of the United
States during
the drive to fulfill Manifest Destiny, a time of unprecedented western
migration and national enthusiasm. Poke was an appropriate choice for
the
country's highest office. He was energetic, flamboyant, and a bit
uncouth.
When he first delivered his propinquity specifications to the Society,
he minced no words in telling them he was "fond of flank steak—the
bigger the rump the better." The young lady shown in the Poke portrait
was his favorite of dozens who made visits to him in the Oval Office.
Her
name was Fanny deBoeuf (a nom de guerre obviously,
literally
translated as hind end of the beef), but not much else is known of her.
Ms. LaTour asserts that she used to sneak into the White House dressed
in the merest scrap of a shift: Presdent Poke didn't like to waste time
on preliminaries.
Presdent William Howard Tafft was a big man,
almost
330 pounds, and it should be no surprise that he also liked his women
big.
During the interregnum between Theodore
Rosevelt and Tafft, the Society had to replace virtually all of its
"propinquitors," since Teddy always preferred women to be slim and
athletic.
The sheer amplitude of the Society's women during the Tafft term is
extraordinary.
Some of them weighed nearly as much as the Presdent and had to be
smuggled
into the Oval Office in huge wardrobes, which gave Tafft the reputation
of being a spendthrift on suits. One might suppose that the
propinquities
were therefore sedate and sedentary occasions, but Ms. LaTour claims
that
Society annals record the replacement of four broken desks in the Oval
Office during the Tafft term. The details, alas, must await the
publication
of the Society's closely guarded journal.
As the successor to Thomas Jeffersen, whose preferences
are well known, James Madison Munroe set many of the precedents
that became Society traditions. As a Vagina
gentleman, he was punctilious about conducting all his Society business
with politesse and grace. Indeed, on many occasions he spoke French,
believing
it the language of courtly love, and reverted to his native tongue only
when it became clear he was not being understood. Always adaptable, the
Society began acquiring its propinquitors from Franch,
including the young lady shown in this official portrait, who resigned
the Parish ballet to dance for Presdent
Munroe—and sometimes on Presdent Munroe—in
the Oval Office. Her name was Ophelie de Pieds, and her entries in the
Society Journal will make fascinating reading for the general public
some
day. Apparently, Ameria's fourth Presdent liked feet.
*The Oval Office Propinquity
Society
As anyone can see, Herman Cain needs to get a great deal naughtier.
More importantly, it seems unlikely Mitt Romney can even get to the
starting gate. Maybe Newt knows what he's doing after all.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Saving Netflix
Wristcutters: A Love Story. Four stars. And it has Tom
Waits. Make
that five stars.
. So Netflix stock is plunging because the company tried to
separate its DVD business from its streaming business. Seemed
reasonable to me, but customers are revolting. Thing is, there's no
limit on the streaming business. You can watch whatever you want, in
any quantity, without incurring additional charges. And there's good
stuff there. So why should streaming be a permanently free add-on to the DVD mail service, which is routinely excellent on its own?
Why I'm recommending three streaming movies I don't think you'll find anywhere
else, at least not easily. What links them? They're all brilliantly
conceived and all have some kind of Christian connection without a
particle of preachiness. A contrarian type of person could interpret
all three as satires. What of? That would be in the eye of the
beholder, wouldn't it?
Wristcutters is the trailer up
top. As dark as dark can be but maybe not completely. I'll say no more
except 'watch it.'
The Troll Hunter is the third
subtitled Scandinavian movie I've recommended here. (The first two were
Lights
in the Dusk (Finnish) and The Sea
(Icelandic.)) This one's a Norwegian documentary, sort of. As deadpan serious as the first two. You'll laugh
your ass off.
The Last Exorcism
is another
documentary. It follows a phony evangelical exorcist who is determined
to expose his own frauds before retiring to a career in real estate.
Don't watch any other trailers and don't read up on the film. Watch it
cold. It's very well done. (And please respect the right of other
readers to do the same...)
Some other time, I may get into the various other offerings of Netflix
streaming, which are profuse. But start with these.
P.S.
Don't want you Tom Waits fans tearing your hair out. Here's the
studio version of the link in the caption.
Does that cheer you up? Me too. It's kind of the 21st Century rendition
of Louis Armstrong's Wonderful World. If you know
what I mean. The pace and the voice are similar. Only the words are a
little different.
. Some sites call this an open thread. I
don't. I call it directed discussion. I deliberately withhold my
personal opinion to make you spout yours. It's a leap of faith. A trio
of stories some of you can be counted on to care about, even if they're
not front page news.
The first I could subtitle "Calling Lake!" New
info on the Global
Warming front:
For the clueless or cynical diehards
who deny global warming, it’s getting awfully cold out there.
The latest icy blast of reality comes from an eminent scientist whom
the climate-change skeptics once lauded as one of their own. Richard
Muller, a respected physicist at the University of California,
Berkeley, used to dismiss alarmist climate research as being “polluted
by political and activist frenzy.” Frustrated at what he considered
shoddy science, Muller launched his own comprehensive study to set the
record straight. Instead, the record set him straight.
“Global warming is real,” Muller wrote last week in The Wall Street
Journal....
Muller and his fellow researchers examined an enormous data set of
observed temperatures from monitoring stations around the world and
concluded that the average land temperature has risen 1 degree Celsius
— or about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit — since the mid-1950s.
This agrees with the increase estimated by the United Nations-sponsored
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Muller’s figures also
conform with the estimates of those British and American researchers
whose catty e-mails were the basis for the alleged “Climategate”
scandal, which was never a scandal in the first place.
The Berkeley group’s research even confirms the infamous “hockey stick”
graph — showing a sharp recent temperature rise — that Muller once
snarkily called “the poster child of the global warming community.”
Muller’s new graph isn’t just similar, it’s identical.
Muller found that skeptics are wrong when they claim that a “heat
island” effect from urbanization is skewing average temperature
readings; monitoring instruments in rural areas show rapid warming,
too. He found that skeptics are wrong to base their arguments on the
fact that records from some sites seem to indicate a cooling trend,
since records from at least twice as many sites clearly indicate
warming. And he found that skeptics are wrong to accuse climate
scientists of cherry-picking the data, since the readings that are
often omitted — because they are judged unreliable — show the same
warming trend.
If you're not interested in discussing AGW, there's a vigorous pundit
debate underway about Herman Cain. Richard
Miniter thinks he could win:
Forget the eye-rolling. Let’s look at
the numbers. Herman Cain is ahead of Romney in virtually all of the
polls conducted in the past two weeks. In both Iowa and nation-wide
Cain leads Romney by 30% to 22%,according to Public Policy Polling, a
respected pollster. Meanwhile the latest NBC-Marist poll puts Cain
ahead of Romney in South Carolina by 30%-26%, and shows Cain and Romney
neck-and-neck in Florida. Cain leads in Ohio by 15%, and in Hawaii by
12%. Only in New Hampshire does Romney stubbornly hold a solid
double-digit lead (15%).
Still, Cain could finish a strong second in New Hampshire. Cain is the
second choice of Perry, Bachmann, Gingrich and Santorum voters, polls
show. If some or all of them are out by the time New Hampshire
Republicans go to the polls, Cain will benefit. Only Huntsman voters
would shift to Romney...
If Cain can survive the sudden media attention, his support among Tea
Partiers will solidify and grow. Once he won the Florida Straw Poll, he
suddenly seemed electable to Tea Partiers. So he caught an updraft and
is now the front-runner. He will stay there until the Tea Party loses
confidence in him (and possibly elevates Gingrich).
Cain has a compelling Horatio Alger story, a warm sense of humor and
sharply defined ideology. The media might call him just a “pizza guy.”
They called Reagan just an actor.
And the Reagan analogy is coming up, again and again. The New
Republic’s Walter Shapiro wrote: “…Cain is certainly not an extremist
out of the Robertson and Buchanan playbooks. He is a cheerful
conservative in the Ronald Reagan mold.”
But Mark
Steyn is reluctantly determined to sound like a grownup:
Don’t get me wrong, I like Herman Cain.
I like “Imagine There’s No Pizza”: It would be the greatest
presidential campaign song since “Tippecanoe And Tyler, Too.” I like
his sunny disposition: Mien can be determinative — it’s why Rick
Santorum is right on almost everything, and going nowhere. I like
Cain’s electrified fence gags, on the general principle that no sane
person should climb into the straitjackets of the politically correct
enforcers.
And yet, and yet. . . . The foreign policy, hostage-trading, abortion
stuff is becoming more difficult to ignore. I don’t think Charles
Krauthammer’s assertion that Cain’s “winging it” fully explains it, nor
does the Pundette’s that he is “incoherent.” Cain’s boast that he can’t
name the president of Beki-beki-beki-beki-beki-beki-stan gets closer to
it. It’s a cute line, notwithstanding that parochial braggadocio is
easier to carry off when you’re a soaring hyperpower rather than a
multi-trillion-dollar sinkhole whose citizens’ future is increasingly
mortgaged to foreigners of one degree of unsavoriness or another.
But the ’stan shtick is a glimpse of the greater truth – that there are
whole areas of public policy in which he simply has no interest. None.
You ask him a question and from the recesses of his mind swim up
half-recalled phrases from some panel discussion he caught once long
ago, and he hopes he grabs the conservative line (“I’m proud to stand
by Israel,” “we don’t negotiate with terrorists,” “life begins at
conception,” whatever) but just as often he doesn’t (with Gretchen
Carlson this morning: “No, abortion should not be a part of the
political discussion”).
His fans say he’s being set up with “Gotcha” questions. But these
aren’t the Hoogivsastans way out on the fringe of the public policy
map. They’re the first stops on the central thruway of American
politics, and have been for most of Cain’s adult life. And it’s
becoming harder to avoid the obvious truth that he hasn’t given them a
moment’s thought.
And for those who are fatigued with the political horserace, I have a
third line of controversy. Tim
Tebow:
After Tebow's first start of the season on Sunday, the debate
remains open for all but the most fanatical in either camp.
The Floridian combines a Johnny Unitas throwback hairstyle with a
running back's physique, a winning smile and a take-home-to-Mom
politeness, all wrapped up with home-schooled Christian values.
That makes him a marketing and branding dream for the Denver
Broncos, the NFL, television and all manner of sponsors.
But there are those who think he might prove to be the NFL's version
of Russian tennis player Anna Kournikova -- popular, attractive and
talented but not cut out for the weekly grind of the professional
circuit.
For three quarters of the game at the Miami Dolphins, the critics
appeared right. Tebow's passing was poor, he needed too much time to
read situations and he just never looked comfortable.
Then, with time running out, he took the game by the scruff of the
neck and the Tebow that had delighted fans of the 2008 Florida Gators
national championship winning team -- brimming with confidence and
willing to improvise -- re-emerged and won the game for his team...
The key phrase is "fanatical." Which I think is more on one side than
the other. I used to like Jamie Dukes of the NFL Network, a shrewd and
well spoken ex-player/commentator. But his recent commentary on two
players has made me suspect that his football insights are compromised
by deep cultural biases. He has a tendency to jeer at particular
players, regardless of their performances. First with Ryan Fitzpatrick,
whom Dukes apparently cannot forgive for having gone to Harvard. He
notoriously called Fitzpatick a "seat-warmer" for whatever real
quarterback the Bills would ultimately draft. Then, after an overlong suspenseful buildup, he sarcastically
claimed he was on the the Fitzpatrick bandwagon (with an option to jump
off) when the Bills went 4-0 early this season.
On Sunday he surpassed himself. Commenting over the highlights of the
Broncos' last minute come from behind victory over the Dolphins, he was
over the top in attributing every part of the comeback to Tebow --
Tebow with the onside kick, Tebow with the kick recovery, Tebow with
the game-winning field goal. It was nasty, and it was obviously
personal. At every turn, he compared Tebow's prior failures in the game to the
performance of Aaron Rodgers, as if not being Aaron Rodgers right now
were proof of a youngster's inborn incompetence.
Compare this with the way so many ex-players, including Dukes, have
treated the return of Michael Vick. He made a mistake. He paid his
debt to society. He deserves a second chance.
So.... uh.... why doesn't Tebow even deserve a first chance? What, uh, mistake has he made? He hasn't
slaughtered dogs? He hasn't killed someone in a DUI accident? He hasn't
committed a drug/gun/domestic abuse felony? No. He's a Christian
missionary who actually seems to live his faith. He's derided as a virgin. What a creep. No wonder he
has to be ridiculed in his first ever NFL start.
Exceptions in the punditry class, to be fair, have included Chris
Berman, who defended Tebow against a scornful ESPN crew, and Terry
Bradshaw, who early in the season acknowledged an NFL prejudice against
unconventional talents and -- based on the fledgling exploits of Cam
Newton, who was also supposed to be a Tebow-like bust -- promised to
open his mind to the possibilities of youngsters.
But when it comes to Tebow, I think there's more going on, and I don't
think it's all about football.
As I say: Your Turn. Do these three stories have something in common? Your call. But if you
can't get fired up about any one of them, that would be on you.