Archive Listing
November 28, 2009 - November 21, 2009
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Escaping Obama
What
its YouTube author is calling the 'Post Barackalyptic Wasteland.'
JUST A BAD DREAM.
Everybody copes in his own way. IP decided to think about other stuff
and so generated his list of 25 movies about America. I chose another
route, opting to find what media I could that was not all about the Second Coming of
Abraham Lincoln. No cable news. No newspapers. No newsweekly magazines.
No women's magazines (They're just The
View on slick paperstock if you want to know.). In fact, I
thought, here was a golden opportunity to catch up on the specialized
periodicals that couldn't possibly have anything to do with a change in
the political leadership in the United States. Was I right? Judge for
yourselves.
For example, everyone who reads this blog knows that I'm a motorhead.
Years ago, I was a huge fan of Car and Driver Magazine, which once
scandalized the automotive world by conducting a performance test
of the Ferrari GTO and the Pontiac GTO -- and preferring the Pontiac. I
lost contact with C&D for a few years during a sojourn in the
midwest. When I left the east coast, they were vociferous opponents of
airbags. When I returned, they were among the most fervent advocates of
same. Apparently, the possibility that airbags could flat-out kill small
women and children by functioning normally had ceased to bother them.
But let bygones be begones, I thought. Maybe they'd be a palliative in
the new age of messianic politics.
Not so much, really. Even the Obama
article was disappointing. Apparently, the president doesn't know how
to drive a stick, and he has an anxiety attack whenever the highway
speed tops 55 mph. Oh, and he positively loathes "Detroit Iron." Who
knew? But the editors found him charming, brilliant, and well-versed on
the topic of hydrocarbons. They're bad.
So I turned instead to Scientific-American. Surely they wouldn't give a
fig about the tsunami of rhetoric that was sweeping the ignoramus
commoners of the nation.
When I read the cover article, I could hardly blame them. It turns out
that Barack Obama does practically everything at an expert level
(except, possibly, drive with a manual transmission). He can play five
games of chess simultaneously and stalemate them all, while hitting the highest number of
triple-word scores in Scrabble ever registered, and extemporize on the bleak
philosophical implications of quantum physics as he's writing a record third
doleful autobiography and cleverly losing a game of dominoes to his two
children and their fashion advisers. No wonder the magazine had to
dedicate three-quarters of the current issue to his cerebral feats of
derring-do.
That's when I remembered National Geographic. The magazine that taught
all American boys whose fathers didn't subscribe to Playboy about
breasts.
I'm not saying the cover article was uninteresting. But there were no
breasts in it. And what does it mean exactly that a forensic
reconstruction of Tutankhamen's face from his shattered mummy looks
exactly Barack Obama? There's no particular indication that the boy
king was an exceptionally able pharaoh. For all we know, the
accomplishments of his administration were largely the work of the
exceptionally able Speaker of the Egyptian House, Pel Osi, whose
remains are on display at Harvard University's Fogg Museum.
NOTE: Silicone implants don't age
well.
Besides, National Geographic isn't what you'd call serious. You'd be
hard pressed to find any teenage boys who subscribe to the Journal of
the Amercan Medical Association, which always puts high art on its
covers with absolutely no indication of what the content inside might
be.
I suppose I should have taken a cue from the fact that JAMA's
post inaugural issue started all over at Issue 1, Volume I, signifying
the beginning of the new era in free healthcare we could all look
forward to from now on. But I didn't. I tried to read the cover
article. Which was all about how Hippocrates and Galen and Salk and
DeBakey were just redneck asshole plumbers compared to the astonishing
medical genius of the new president of the Unites States. I stopped
reading when they claimed he could drive a manual transmission.
If you can't trust anyone else, you can trust Popular Mechanics.
Hardheaded realists all. Right?
Wrong.
So I figured there was one periodial so high toned, so snooty, so
divorced from everyday reality that the very worst I might encounter
would be Donald Trump's latest makeover of his largest Manhattan
penthouse. Architectural Digest does
not care about the stray zephyrs of political fashion.
Which is when I gave up on periodicals. I turned on the TV again, but
this time with an eye to the imperturbably irrelevant channels, the
ones that couldn't be topical if they tried. Like Nickelodeon. They do
reruns of Star Trek, the real one, for God's sake.
Something
to do with warp drive. I know it is.
There had to be some safety somewhere. After all, what could anybody do
to the Honeymooners?
He's
the president of the Raccoons or something. Something bad.
And so, before I even looked, I knew that the gush had reached I Love
Lucy too. Which I never even liked in the first place.
She
just LOVES him. Doesn't she?
By then I knew. The TOON channel:
Spongebob
has ALWAYS believed in hope and change.
And HGTV.
Bob Vila can feel the love, too. Obama is very handy with power tools. They
say.
And even the Food Channel.
He can whip up an omelet or devise a
masterly fruit compote.
Paula Deen thinks he's the best thing since chicken dumplings.
Drudge says the Obama inauguration got 35
times the worldwide coverage of the Bush inaugural. I'm pretty sure
he's misunderstimated the total by a bunch.
But I don't mind. There's only one icon that will send a chill to my
bones. And we may be months and months away from that.
How does the line go? "Build it and they will come."
Like gangbusters.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
The Obamascension
Too
grandiose? Just want to make sure you get your money's worth.
THE
LINCOLN LOG. Just a quick update on inauguration details, in case
you're one of the estimated 50 million people who will be squeezing
into Washington, DC, for the festivities. You'll need to park your car
in Poughkeepsie, Scranton, or Raleigh and walk the rest of the way to
the ceremony, so wear comfortable shoes like these.
The Air Jordan XXO, official shoe of
the 2009 inauguration. Just $378 a pair (unless you buy from
a scalper at the event).
But the good news is, thanks to a
last-minute congressional bailout that has (approximately) doubled the
inauguration budget from $150 million to $4.5 trillion, the bells and
whistles are going to be even splashier than promised. The oath of
office will be administered by the Lord and Creator of the Universe
himself since Abraham Lincoln was, for some reason, still unavailable.
But
they'll still be using the Lincoln Bible.
For this reason, the Secret Service will be standing down today, and
security will be handled by some of God's peeps instead.
The
bodyguard during the Obamaddress will be the archangels Gabriel, Michael, and
Taekwon.
In another last minute change, Beyonce will NOT be singing the Etta
James classic "At Last." Etta
will. (Thank God for that. He sort of insisted.)
Out
In
But Beyonce will still be on hand, wearing a sexy dress with her Air
Jordan XXOs. Something she's actually good at.
The only bummer -- and we hate to mention it, but you need to know --
is that due to federal regulations and space limitations, the authentic
Lincoln-Pottie everybody will be using is located behind the FBI
building, next to the Nixon Memorial Tape Dumpster. Be prepared to wait
in line for a few weeks if you need to go.
Maybe you could all sing Kumbaya or
something while you wait.
Have a nice time. I'm sure it will be worth the few inconveniences
you'll have to put up with.
Part V:
Understanding
America
in 25 Movies...
Why
we're the Greatest Nation. Ever.
NEXT
LOT. I know I promised Baby Boomers, but that's not completely
accurate, any more than the things which Baby Boomers are anxious to
take credit for are really their accomplishments. For example, neither
the Beatles nor the Stones
were Baby Boomers, even though they became the soundtrack of that
entire generation of self-obsessed jerks. The miserably sad truth is that Baby Boomers have produced almost nothing memorable, significant, or new in their whole time on earth. With that disclaimer
delivered, here's the final set of my list of 25.
Consider this one a kind of book end to Bird (No. 19). It's popular among
American intellectuals to celebrate black contributions to music, which
originated with uneducated folk among the rural poor, and to laugh out
loud at country music, which originated with uneducated folk among the
rural poor. No wonder they're so convinced we're a racist nation. This
movie fills a couple of holes in our movie picture of America. It
shines a light on the other distinctively American contribution to our
nation's hold on the world's music (quit chortling: the Stones owe as
much to country as they do to Motown), and it also acknowledges, as
Hollywood almost never does, the powerful cultural impact of our
agrarian population -- you know, the people who drive pickup trucks,
wear cowboy boots, and grow the food we and a big chunk of the rest of
the world eat. Like Elvis Presley and Roy Orbison, Johnny Cash (not a boomer) became a
transcendant figure, beyond genre and beyond the reach of critcs. But
unlike the other two, his persona was not a manufactured or gimmicky
invention. He was exactly what he looked like on stage -- a barely
contained force of nature who intertwined rage, love, lust, violence,
and tenderness so tightly into his voice that the contradictions
produced the permanent bass quaver which made every song sound like the
five minutes of roller-coaster tension before a prison riot. This movie
is the story of his life, the good and the awful both, and it's one a
huge percentage of
Americans can relate to. The first terrible thing happens on the farm,
and it never stops resonating through all the subsequent ups and downs
of Cash's life. Which is exactly how life can be. Even in the pampered
place The New York Times sums
up as white America. With stunning performances by Joaquin Phoenix,
Reese Witherspoon, and the busiest actor in show business, Robert
Patrick. This is about country. Our
country. (clip)
(and a bonus) [DO watch the last clip. It's IP's theme song, too.]
For this choice I have to give a nod to Ed Morrissey at Hotair. He
named it as one of the worst movies of the past 25 years, which finally
decided the debate I'd been having with myself between TheDeer Hunter and We Were Soldiers as the
necessary Vietnam movie to include here. [Singling out The Deer Hunter as a 'worst' on any
list that also includes Forrest Gump, Apocalypse Now, Coming Home, Born on the Fourth of July, and
Platoon, {a.k.a. the Oliver
Stone Poor Poor Pitiful Me Story} is
about as outrageous as it gets... but enough about Morrissey.] I happen
to know the part of Pennsylvania where the characters in The Deer
Hunter lived, and I can assure you the rendition of their lives -- in
the wild, on the road, and in the bars -- is pitch perfect. The
performances by John Savage, Meryl Streep, and most of all the amazing
Christopher Walken are astonishing. The movie shows what other Vietnam
movies don't, the wrenching dislocation of lives effected by a war in
which the role of soldier was changed from winning battles and
territory to mere killing . It has more impact because it is long and
slow, because it shows us the lives of the men before their service,
and the amplifying effects of memory after the fact, when memory cannot
coexist with the life that would have been lived without a
soul-destroying derailment onto a hell nothing in their previous lives
could have prepared them for. It's not a Hollywood movie in any
traditional sense. It's a journey to the heart of darkness Coppola
could never have filmed because he
had read the book, and the characters in this movie never did. They
just lived it.
(clip) (and another) Between these two
clips, there's a brief, exploding lifetime of unbearable pain. Was the
movie long? Not as long as the distance between a western Pennsylvania
bar and a bloodsport gambling den in Southeast Asia. We're still
living that distance down today.
One of my all-time favorite movies about men. No, not the Clint
Eastwood/John Wayne sort of men. The real kind. Smart, creative,
focused, perseverant to the last second of the last gasp of the last
chance. And they wear plastic pocket protectors the whole time. This is
the movie where you can see the real pioneering spirit that probably
won the west during the age of Manifest Destiny. The careful planners
who packed exactly the right combination of food and water and
ammunition and spare parts for the conestoga wagon, plus a few handy
tools to fix things if the worst happened. "Houston, we have a
problem." And such a problem. Unprecedented and wholly unanticipated.
Bringing our men home from a certainly fatal disaster in space that
they then passed off as a routine "doing what we're paid to do" example
of ordinary competence. (See Slasha and CP's response in the Comments
section of this
post.) It's a perfect mix of both
kinds of American hero -- the
ostentatiously risk-taking hero-type heroes that have always been part
of out national story, who live up to their own highest expectations
even as the awkward, shy, too-smart-to-fit-in antihero-type heroes put
their minds and their faith on the line to do the impossible. THIS is
what Americans can do, and it's all BIG. The budget, the technology,
the objective, the calamity, the eventual triumph against prohibitive
odds. And the wives. God, women are wonderful. If Obama has seen any
movie on this list, I hope the most that he
has seen this one. (clip)
You'll note that the press has played a part throughout this list,
usually in their historical role as buzzard opportunists feeding on the
travails of real people doing real things while the parasites prosper.
I have looked, but it's almost impossible to find a movie that treats
the press without scorn, satire, or wry cynicism (including especially this,
7:40 in) until All the President's
Men. Which is the story of the Washington
Post doing everything it can to bring down a president of the
United States (who, quite coincidentally, they had hated since his first appearance in
public life.) More than any other movie on the list, this one served as
a recruiting tool that brought armies of young people into a trade
for reasons precisely opposite the stated principles of the (so-called)
profession. They watched this piece of fiction and signed up as
journalists to "make a difference," "save the world," and "speak truth
to power." None of which has anything whatever to do with reporting the
facts, without fear or favor or emotion or bias or slanted diction, to
the people who buy newspapers. If 'On the Waterfront' is the best
American movie, this is the most important American movie, and its
message to its audience was, and is, absolutely corrupting. Why are The
New York Times, The Boston Globe, The Washington Post, The Boston
Globe, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Chicago Sun-Times and Tribune,
and The LA Times dying with withered claws outstretched for a federal
bailout from what used to be their sacred target? This movie. That's
why. Anyone who saw this movie and joined the press afterwards is the
journalistic equivalent of a crack whore. Fact. These are the people
who are the source of Bush Derangement Syndrome. But you can't
understand America without seeing this monstrosity of a movie. And,
God, how they LOVE this image of themselves. If they only knew what a
sickness they've infected
us with... (clip)
So far, the best 9/11 movie. A small production, a small budget, a
small focus. A freelance writer (Sigourney Weaver) helping a New York
Fire Department captain (Anthony LaPaglia) write last words about his
men who died in the terror attack on the Twin Towers. It's our new
reality. Still. No politics. No hysterics and no bathos. No speculation
(why United 93 isn't on the list).
No special effects. Just people. Americans. Which is who we are. And
hopefully will remain, no matter how high-flown the oratory from the
bully pulpit of The One. See it. (clip)
There you have it. And now I have to admit I've failed. There are still
holes. This is too big a country to be understood in just 25 movies, no
matter how carefully chosen. I have another ten Honorable Mentions that are actually
cheating. Because they're as
important as the first 25. What an amazng country we live in. Stay
tuned for the Tacked-On Ten, as well as some observations about
interesting patterns I've observed in my selections.
Still. Go ahead and sharpshoot. The ones that didn't make the 25 didn't
make the 25 and I'm accountable for what I've chosen. It's just that
there's more, and we're more than what I've picked out.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Part IV:
Understanding
America
in 25 Movies...
Black
and white and a million shades of gray. In one movie.
. Well, we've reached the fifties, that decade in America where
nothing interesting whatever happened because the Baby Boomers were in
cribs and all the people who know everything now share the same smeared
memory of conformist idiots doing exactly what they were told, unless
they were energized by Elvis and other Top Forty acts to kick authority
in the balls. You know, reacting against the moron clowns who raised
them and getting ready for the inspired and enlightened sixties. It's
possible something interesting might have happened if it weren't for
the same old Republican problem -- an old white man as president, who
didn't know anything about anything, which doomed the fifties to a kind
of cartoonish timeout in which people didn't live their lives (didn't
even know they had genitals) and America almost imploded from boredom.
Exhibit A. Unless it's really Exhibit Z. I love this movie. Just as many men
who deplore the anger and hostility of feminism love women individually
for all the marvelous capabilities that redeem the worst of their
chosen mates. In fact, this is the movie I would prescribe for all
those men who act baffled at how long their wives and girlfriends spend
shopping for the right card for every occasion, including their own
sorry-ass birthdays and anniversaries. READ THE CARDS. This is a movie
about the lives so many women lead, even today, and what's
distinctively American about it is the entrepreneurial possibility our
great nation offers to those who are determined to keep fighting as
individuals for what matters most in their lives. What is schlock in
critical terms can be high art in life terms, and this is the story of
a life of artistic genius in a purely fifties American context. If you
can watch this movie and NOT fall in love all over again with the whole
idea of the women in our lives, you are probably a serial killer. Watch
it and you will never again feel a moment's impatience with her
meticulous wrapping of gifts that will be torn open in a moment by
children or shunted aside by embittered oldsters. You will just love
her -- and all the seemingly silly rituals and courtesies she so
faithfully executes while caring for everyone more than she does for
herself. If she wears your team's football jersey and assembles the
tailgate feast while raising your kids on the side, she's not your
subordinate. She's the blessing that redeems all the disgusting low
points of your life. Back in the fifties, she held the whole country
together. Thanks to her, there were two-parent families and homes to go
back to. She had the Christian gift of forgiveness. Now that we've worked so hard to turn her into us, and she's
just another struggling, narcissistic single-mother household, what are we? Better?
Freer? Maybe you and she should talk about it. (clip)
Yeah, we've dissed
this one, too. But it's still part of who we are as a nation. Not the
mob, but the mafia, whose sick code of silence has infected every
organization that cultivates a sense of its own specialness. Including
the government. All organizations are prey to the accumulated
conviction that they are too important to obey anyone else's rules.
Show me any large, old organization, and I will show you a mafia. In
fact, that why I have always hated this movie so much. The sense of
belonging to a privileged, elite group which can thumb its nose at more
universal affiliations is what I have always despised about investment
bankers and corporate executives quoting lines from The Godfather as life lessons or
Rules of Engagement. To an obsolete WASP like me, it teaches all the
wrong lessons -- weakness
where you should be strong and reactive wrong where you should seek
out the hard right thing to do. But here's the irony. All of you who
turn your noses up at the fifties, who think that realistic, pragmatic
life began in the post-superstitious age of the enlightened,
"progressive" sixties -- why do you still
hearken back to the "offer that can't be refused"? Because for all your
supposed education and rationality, you are trapped in the
anti-romanticism of Michael Corleone, the raw display of Machiavellian
power that enables you to perpetrate the hoax of global warming, the
myth of salvation by a new elitely chosen Godfather, and the lie that a
chosen iconic boss can somehow make everything right, no matter how
ruthless and hypocritical his methods. Why American intellectuals who have
always been free still idolize Castro. They worship the fucking drama
of a life-and-death overlord, given how dull life is if you're just an
Irish consigliere played by Robert Duvall. Why do the freest people on
earth still want (anti)royalty to rule them? Maybe Obama will explain.
Whatever the answer is, there is a uniquely American answer. Which, in
this case, is headquartered in the boring fifties. I hate it. But it's
still part of who we are and have become. (clip)
Never cared for Spike Lee either. But this is a great movie. Quite free
of some of his other, more self-indulgent peaeans to the moral
imperviousness of blackness. The subject made him honest. Malcolm X
began as a thug. One can understand the extremity of his escape route.
In fact, one -- meaning I -- can understand why he became so
radicalized. Does this mean that he was right for all black men for all
time? No. But it's the American Way that you get to choose. Malcolm X
chose. Decidedly. Intellectually. Morally. And he chose wrong. Not Spike
Lee's point, I suppose. I think he was after an alternative Christ for
African-Americans who sort-of-thought MLK had failed kind of thing. The
last-refuge-ofanger kind of thing.
But here's the irony. I admire this movie as a testament of real
honesty. I thought Spike Lee created a masterpiece. I thought he was
telling black people that the way out of the abyss was education. Which
it is. Malcolm X learned how to read and write and speak. Eloquently. That was
the lesson. Not the particular politics he advocated. Which are
completely at odds with everything I have experienced in the
African-American community. His attraction to Islam was an attraction
to discipline. Control everything. He realized what made
black people a stereotype in the white world and he stood all that on its
ear. Except that he was wrong. About everything. He had a bigger dream
than MLK. He dared to believe that black people could transcend their
heritage and history and be better than the white folk at having
families, being faithful to their wives, and being fathers to their
children. He was wrong. They killed him for it. In a hail of bullets.
Black people in America remain for the most part slaves, governed by an
outlaw, slave mentality. Malcolm X
is proof that this is an unnecessary mentality. But the extremity of his
philosophy and his sacrifice are a huge part of the burden we all bear.
We prefer the much much dumber vision of MLK. Who fantasized that his own
people might one day give up the resentments of their past and rely on
their own gifts instead. Malcolm X knew better. That blacks had to
exceed whites in morality, accomplishment and discipline to win their
separate peace, because self-respect was more important than the flattery of debtors.
Remember how nobody in this country ever even noticed black people before
the sixties and the dawn of the Civil Rights era? I mean, like Malcolm
X was wrong, and oh go to hell. Except for Jazz. Americans have loved black musicians for
several centuries, but they've also cited them as the bad moral examples they've always been. Because Americans prefer delivering sermons over the doomed dead to being energized and enlightened by the brilliant live performances of their social inferiors. (Like none of your friends ever dance, do they? Racist sticks...) Another instance. (clip -- dubbed
in Italian, but it doesn't matter)
Probably the greatest American move ever. The greatest acting
performance. The greatest screenplay. The greatest director. The
greatest irony between the story told and the story implied. The
greatest cultural vindication demonstrated by the greatest industry
insult. The movie is great art by itself, and it's also history, and
its
after-effects are the QED of its point. No artist can ever hope for
more than Elia Kazan achieved with On
the Waterfront. And no artist can ever recover from the insults
deliverately heaped on Eia Kazan for having made this movie. I could
explain all this. But I also have the
sense that our readers who lionize Reservoir
Dogs and Saw IV need
to step up and ask what the big deal is. It's a VERY BIG DEAL. Here is
the movie that analogizes history, encapsulates history, is history, critiques history, and
stands as a personal tragedy that is also one of the sorriest instances
of American history you can expect to find in a supposedly free country.
Elia Kazan did the right thing. Just like Terry Malloy. He got
beaten mostly to death for it the same fashion. That's also part of the
American Way.
So, without apologies, here's the final scene of the greatest American
movie ever made:
Next up, the Baby Boomers.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Part III:
Understanding
America
in 25 Movies...
An American original sounding off...
and still echoing.
NEXT
LOT. I appreciate the comments and I find some of your nominations
interesting, but I won't be responding to any of them until I have
finished filling in my complete set. It's the whole that's really the
point here, and I reiterate my suggestion that those who are intrigued
try to come up their own wholes. It forces you out of your usual
boundaries and preferences, which can only expand your perspective.
It's also a fun challenge. So let's get back to it.
There's more than one decent movie about the Great Depression
obviously. It's one of our favorite subjects as a nation and one
Hollywood is better equipped to exploit than many others. Of the recent
set, I'm fond of Cinderella Man, which immerses
the audience more deeply into the common experience of the depression
than Sea Biscuit does, but
the story of the little horse who captured a nation's heart is much
more than another clicheed sports movie. And the characters make it
more than just a depression movie, too. With Jeff Bridges as the
self-made man who dares to tweak the noses of Old Money, Tobey Maguire
as the damaged jockey orphaned by the depression, Chris Cooper as the
pragmatic horse-whispering westerner, and William H. Macey as the
racetrack tout stand-in for the sporting press, Sea Biscuit manages to interweave
the lives of a fair swath of 1930s America. Various minor characters
also contribute to this breadth, including Michael O'Neill as the
jockey's learned but depression-devastated father and Eddy Jones as the
haughty owner of Triple Crown winner War Admiral. The David McCullough
narration is over the top at times, and there are too many commercials
for FDR for my taste, but the economic context in which Sea Biscuit
became a national phenomenon is as important as the story's prime
players. Most appealing of all about the movie is its refusal to engage
in pity for the real tragedies experienced by its two main characters.
They're knocked down hard, but they keep getting back up again, which
is about as fundamental a part of the traditional American character as
there is. And they help one another, also without pity, but with quiet
understanding and humor. That's how we got through the depression as a
people, and it's why Sea Biscuit
works so well on so many levels. (clip) (and a bonus)
[Before the nitpickers point them out, I'll note the movie got a couple
things wrong. It's not true that Sea Biscuit drew more mentions in the
press in 1938 than FDR did; nobody and nothing could do that. And War
Admiral was not nearly as big (18 hands!?) as he was described in the
script. Both horses, in fact, were smaller than average for racehorses.
They were also blood relations, both descended from thoroughbred
royalty, but who says bluebloods can't also be heroes sometimes?]
A great production by Martin Scorsese and a truly outstanding
performance by Leonardo di Caprio as the legendary Howard Hughes
The scope of the man's interests and accomplishments was prodigious,
and so is the scope of this movie, covering his public and private life
from the late 1920s to the late 1940s. As you watch his innovations as
a movie producer (Hell's Angels, 1930), his
relentless career as a daredevil pilot, and his near-psychotic
perfectionism as an aircraft designer and manufacturer and commercial
airline executive -- with time out for romancing the great beauties of
his day, and the occasional
nervous breakdown -- the refrain that keeps popping into your head is
"only in America." That a man so driven by crippling personal demons
could also be an astute and visionary businessman is an unusual and
much needed affirmation of the importance of individuality in our
nation's extraordinary history. We tend to think of tycoons and CEOs as
gray, dry calculating machines. Many are that way, of course, but there
are no epic film biographies of the bold men who built our biggest
industries from scratch: not of Andrew Carnegie,
E. I. du Pont,
John D.
Rockefeller, Henry
Ford, or William
Durant. Like Hughes, they were all giants, flawed but ferociously
determined creators of wealth which has fed and enabled more people
than it has abused or oppressed. And Hughes, in this movie, is the only
one we're given a chance to observe and assess for ourselves. (clip)
[TIME OUT: There was a war Hollywood has
covered voluminously, of course. Get out the long knives; everyone is
going to have his favorites here. I'm allowing myself three because
World War II has been so central to the lives and subsequent history of
Americans as a nation and a people. I'll explain my criteria briefly so
at least you'll know why some of your picks aren't mine. I left out the
Grand Hotel treatments that try to depict an entire epochal battle
because in character terms they tend to be superficial -- to my mind --
and distractingly studded with famous actors playing real people who
must always be presented in purely heroic terms. Thus, I've cut Tora!
Tora! Tora!, The Longest Day,
Midway, A Bridge Too Far, and The Great Escape. Sorry. I've
also
passed up the great biopics, like John Ford's The Wings of Eagles and the
much admired Patton, because
the greater story of World War II is that it was fought by an
overwhelmingly civilian military. How they did that is the point of
understanding a movie should seek to provide.
And before I get to my picks, I also want to acknowledge that, once
again, television has made some significant contributions. Most people
are probably familiar with Band of
Brothers; if you haven't seen it, do so. It's magnificent.
Fewer
will be aware of a modest movie starring Tom Selleck as Eisenhower (I
know, I know, but it's good)
during the planning phase of the Normandy invasion. It's called Ike:
Countdown to D-Day. Even fewer of you will remember the 26-hour
long documentary TV series Victory at Sea, which featured
scoring by Richard Rodgers and narration by the inimitable Leonard
Graves. It's mesmerizing and poignant and heroic all at once. I promise
you won't regret buying it.
I've written about this one before.
It's not just a great war movie. It's a great movie period. Its subject
is the Eighth Army Air Force stationed in England in the early days of
America's entry into the war. They pioneered daylight bombing
raids over Germany and suffered casualties so horrendous they rivaled
those of the entire Pacific theater. How can they climb into those
planes every day knowing that as many as a third of them won't be
coming back? Who can order them to do it, day after day and month after
month? That's the movie in a nutshell. With a fine performance by
Gregory Peck. (clip)
Same question. How did they do it? All the U.S. Marines who landed at
Tarawa, Iwo Jima, Saipan, and Okinawa. This is the best movie about the
WWII marines because it's the closest in time and it doesn't sugarcoat
the mean hardness of preparing men for hand-to-hand combat against an
implacable enemy. One of John Wayne's few great performances. That's
all I'll tell you. If you haven't seen it, git 'er done. (clip)
As you can see, my preference is for the
older movies about WWII because despite the limitations on violence and
language, they reflect a more intimate understanding of the people of
the time. Newer movies have a distressing habit of inserting more
modern
sensibilities into the past, with frequently troubling discords. (The
best example I can think of is the character played by Donald
Sutherland in Kelly's Heroes.
Funny at one level and just ludicrous at another.) But I'm giving my
third
spot to Saving Private Ryan
because its opening sequence makes
you feel as if you really are there on the beach at D-Day. It is
incredibly loud, jarring, shocking, brutal, and intense. World War II
did not take place on a
Hollywood back
lot, and the killing and dying did not happen in sanitized soft focus
along artfully chosen lines of sight. This movie is the antidote for
all that.
I'm
posting this clip here because YouTube wants you to prove how old you
are, which could be administratively
unacceptable to some of you. So, if you're not 18 don't watch it. And if you recoil
from explicit violence, well, you've been warned.
. It always makes me nervous when people start tossing around
the term "miracle." Not because I don't believe they ever happen, but
because I can feel the insipid grin of the disbelievers, waiting for
any opportunity to restate for the umpty-umpth time the threadbare
objection, "Why do bad things happen to good people?" Every purported
miracle is, to them, a reminder of all the miracles that somehow didn't occur somewhere else at some
other time.
I hate that grin and all the arrogant banality which congratulates
itself on knowing the physics of a universe honest physicists know they
don't, and maybe can't, fully comprehend. So I'm going to risk the
scorn and ridicule of the sophists by proposing an analogy that may
help others consider a new way of thinking about the "bad things
happen to good people" objection.
In the grand scheme of things, miracles are pretty rare. That is, the
kinds of events which even people who believe in them might call
miracles are rare. When you think about it, rarity is built into the
definition. If every bad thing that threatened to occur were somehow
prevented or reversed after the fact (like sudden total remissions from
terminal cancer), the outcomes wouldn't be considered miracles. They'd
just be the way things work. Miracles are an exception. OR they are
subject to particular conditions which are hard to bring about,
especially since we don't have much of an idea about what those
conditions might be. For example, winning the Powerball lottery is an
incredible long shot that nevertheless does occur; however, it does
have an unavoidable pre-condition. You must first purchase a Powerball
ticket.
On to my analogy. From time immemorial divinity has been closely
associated with lightning. Zeus, Jove, Jupiter, and even the Bible's
Yahweh have been associated with lightning bolts, and there's no
mystery about why. It's an ipso facto perfect symbol of a power from
above visibly impacting the earth (and its inhabitants) below.
Lightning strikes are pretty common events. Fatal lightning strikes on
individual people are less so. That power from above is more or less
always there. Its direct connection with human beings is limited by
certain pre-conditions. People who know better than to wander around
out in the open during a thunderstorm are not likely to be struck. And,
generally speaking, lightning is more likely to strike big tall things
like trees and church steeples rather than little things like people.
But why does lightning strike
tall things? Repeatedly. Which it does. Does it know that the tall
things are there? And if it doesn't, why wouldn't it just strike
randomly all over the place until it happened to connect with something
it can light up? Why does it strike the tree more often than the
outstandingly conductive bronze lawn ornament 24 inches off the ground?
Why? Because a lightning strike is a two-way process. The lightning
bolt reaches down from the sky, and prospective targets on the ground
reach up. They send out what
are called streamers, which meet up with the lightning bolt and
establish a connection. Here are two photos of streamers.
Connection made.
Connection sought.
The streamer is, in our analogy, a pre-condition. It's the act of
buying the Powerball ticket. And it helps to be a tall tree or a church
steeple or a steel water tower at the center of town when a
thunderstorm is in the air.
All of which is a fancy way of saying that miracles may, in fact, be
precipitated by their recipients. Not through goodness or virtue alone
but because they are also associated with preparedness, mass of some
sort, and the kind of sharp focus we see in the streamer photographs.
That's what's so cool about the so-called Miracle of the Hudson. We can
actually see a confluence of circumstances that apparently, luckily, resulted in
-- but just possibly catalyzed -- an incredibly unlikely outcome. A variety of
fortunate circumstances cannot explain away the improbability of the outcome,
however much we want to play games with odds and statistics. The fact
is, commercial airliners without engines "fly" with as much lift as a
falling boulder, and they, well, effectively never land with wings straight and
level on the water.
But in this case there were streamers. A pilot who was not only skilled
but learned in the split-second differentials of commercial air
disasters, who had made a long academic and practical study of air
safety under emergency conditions, and who (to be frivolous for a
moment) bears a striking resemblance to Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.
The Captain of Flight 1549 and
Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. (Commander Fairbanks's uniform is real btw. He
won the Silver Star in WWII.)
He was sending up a streamer. As were the ferry crews and FDNY
personnel who responded so swiftly, as well as the passengers who
quelled their impulse to panic and responded to the ancient call,
"women and children first." Preparation, determination, and cool heads
with a fervent desire to do the right thing are all streamers, and
there was mass behind the entire effort. The lightning bolt that could
have remained in the clouds reached down to make a connection, and the
incredibly (impossibly?) unlikely outcome occurred.
Just an analogy. Not even a theory. But if we follow the analogy, we
can also glimpse the possibility that just as lightning bolts are
chaotic things, so might be miracles. In my own mind, the collapse of
the Twin Towers was a miracle for its relatively
low loss of life. It could have been upwards of 20,000, as many
surmised it was in the darkest hours of 9/11. But how many brilliantly
bright streamers went up that day, from firefighters and policemen and
gravely unselfish civilians, to connect with the lightning that brought
so many thousands of people to safety? I know the grinners would cite
that day as a miracle that didn't happen. But you have to remember that
they live in an irretrievably
drab world of actuarial tables and lottery tickets that win nothing but
heartache and ruin.
But when their turn in the storm comes, they too will pray for a
miracle. And they might even receive it -- if they're prepared,
focused, and united in unselfish resolve.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Right Again
If
he can play God in a leather jumpsuit, he can play the Messiah
too.
MAKING
NICE FUN. Back
in October
2008, we looked into our crystal ball and saw the usual idiocy
coming out of Hollywood:
With the world eagerly awaiting "W,"
Oliver Stone's movie treatment of George and Laura Bush et al, it's
probably not too early to start anticipating a docudrama about our next First Couple. These things
take time to plan, fund, and produce, you know. So we thought we'd help
out with a few development suggestions for the movie we're pretty sure
should be called "O."
There's no question that it should be another Oliver Stone production.
He has a real talent for a creative approach to historical subjects.
But it will have to differ in scope from "W," which is timed to
coincide with the end of the Bush administration and the election of a
replacement president. "O" needs to be released in October 2012 when
Obama is seeking his second term, which means that it will have to be
devoted less than half to the first term and more than half to the
incredible story of how Barack and Michelle -- against all odds --
stormed the gates of power to achieve domain over their racist nation...
You can see that the casting will be critical. We know the picture up
top [in the original post] suggests that the lead roles might be played
by Whoopi Goldberg
and Jaleel
"Urkel"
White, but this is the movies and it has to be much much better
than that. We have some suggestions. There's only one good choice for
the part of Michelle... Vanessa Williams of "Ugly Betty" fame
would rock as a kick-ass First Lady... And forget Urkel. There's only
one man with the cool and the ears to
play Barack the Stud...
Guess who we picked. Well, actually you don't have to guess. It's not a
prediction any more; it's news:
Will
Smith 'to play' Barack Obama as US President in Hollywood movie
Hollywood film star Will Smith has
staked his claim to play Barack
Obama in a movie about his rise to become US President and America’s
first black leader.
Smith has staked his claim to play the role, even before Barack Obama
has been inaugurated as president.
Speaking at the premiere of his new film Seven Pounds at the Empire,
Leicester Square, in London, Smith laughed about reports that the US
President-elect had indicated that he would like the actor to play him
if his life story were ever to be made into a movie.
“If I am ordered by my commander in chief to star in a film about him,
I will do my duty as an American," he said, beaming.
Now, if they'll just follow the
rest of our casting recommendations, they'll have a pretty good movie
to romance us with in 2012. We also have a new title suggestion, just in case they don't like "O." How about "The Wild Wild West Wing"? Yeah, we like it too.
I'm sure Larry
Kudlow and the other supine conservatives on the massive Obama
bandwagon (or is it a bus?)
can hardly wait.
. For the record, my little experiment predates what's going on
right now at The
Corner:
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Movie Blegging [John J. Miller]
What are the best conservative movies of the last 25 years?
This cinema epoch begins roughly with the release of Red Dawn in 1984.
I'd like the opinions of Cornerites. Email your suggestions to me at
nrorocks — at — yahoo.com. Send as many as you like, but please make
sure to include at least a line or two of explanation.
The fruits of your labors will become apparent within the next few
weeks.
I'd also like to draw a distinction between what John J. Miller is
doing and what I'm trying to do. The term "conservative movies" argues
a message of some kind.
That's not what I'm after. I'm after a fair, as I've said,
understanding of the American experience, warts and all. It's a tougher
job than picking out a handful of movies that seem to emphasize only
those values to which I, or we, or any select set of people, subscribe.
In short, I'm trying to be inclusive and fair, not exclusive and
partisan. I may fail because I am
a partisan, but I'm trying to honor the incredible variety of
experience of my countrymen. If you want to see what Miller's call to
arms evokes, you can find it at Hotair.com, but I'm not linking to it
because I don't want to taint my own selections.
Now. On with what I started yesterday.
6. Gangs of New York. I've had many
quarrels with Martin Scorsese's choice of movies to make over the
years, but there's no doubt he's a gifted and brilliant director. This
is the one "mob" movie I'm glad he made. It illuminates a heretofore
invisible part of America's history, the life of urban immigrants at
the very beginning of the American industrial revolution. It's ugly,
violent, and repellent, but so was life for the millions of Irish
Catholics who came here fleeing the potato famine. New York was not
always the glittering Manhattan of our self-mythologizing media. What
the immigrants of that time eventually acquired they earned with
multiple lifetimes of toil and sacrifice. They weren't all good,
either. But enough of them were. Now "Irish" is a happy badge worn on
St. Patrick's Day. It wasn't always so. And when you've watched the
draft riots, how happy are you that Obama chooses to regard Lincoln as
the saint who complements his own divinity? (clip)
A leap forward in time, even though we're still in the Wild West. Funny
how that works. There are still sixguns, but there are also
automobiles, and this story of a horse race that resembles the Tour de
France includes an astonishing scene describing Teddy Roosevelt at the
battle of San Juan Hill. It's not a great movie because it includes,
among other things, an "emancipated" Candace Bergen in a paid acting
role, but it also highlights a typically American love of animals and
the kind of individualism that flies in the face of easy stereotypes.
And a dental scene that will chill your bones and remind you of how
much we moderns have to be thankful for -- if we can let go of our
nostalgia for the, um, wild west. The press is here too, in all its
inveterate scummy rapaciousness. Regardless of its nods to old movie
western traditions, this movie is a turn-of-the-century slice of life
that balances the American competitive spirit with our many better
qualities. (clip)
About golf. Frivolous? Hardly. The year was 1913, one of the great
turning points in American history. It was the year before the
beginning of World War I, the year in which the federal income tax was
ratified as a constitutional amendment, and the year of the Triangle Factory Fire
which exposed the horrid working conditions of so many sweat shops that
exploited immigrant workers. It was also the year in which Francis
Ouimet, a blue collar American amateur,
upset the best golfers in Britain in the U.S. Open, permanently
changing the history of the sport and igniting a huge popular following
for what had once been a game chiefly for aristocrats. The movie
highlights the class issues as well as the qualities it takes to win
against great odds, which is perhaps the most uniquely American trait
of all. Guaranteed: You will tear up when Dad, in his hellish job in
the tunnels, sees his son on the front page of the newspaper and when
Mom impulsively breaches the class barrier to crash the U.S. Open golf
course across the street from her home. Sentimental? Yes. True?
Probably not far off. (clip -- star
interview only)
[YET ANOTHER HUGE HOLE: Hollywood has never
done a searching movie about the American participation in World War I,
which was unquestionably the most traumatic experience the world has
undergone in the last 150 years. So there's no entry here. This pains me
particularly because my own grandfather fought with the Rainbow
Division in France and never recovered from the ailments he incurred in
the trenches during months of vicious fighting. I mean, yeah, I know
there was Sergeant York, who was indeed a
great hero, but the movie made it look as if you could beat the
Kaiser's troops bloodlessly by surprising them at the right angle. The
only treatment by an American film director that did some justice to
the subject was Stanley Kubrick's Paths
of Glory, which was about, uh, the French. In 1930, Howard
Hughes also released Hell's
Angels, which is probably a masterpiece on a par with Citizen Kane about World War I
aerial combat, but the air war was always a sidebar to the horrific
experience of the infantry, where 99 percent of the casualties
occurred. As with the American Revolution, the only movie that deals
with the reality was made for TV. If you're interested, see The Lost
Battalion.]
I never liked this movie, but it's still an important part of the
American experience. Most people don't know just how early Communism
became a serious fixation of the American intellectual class.
Once again we're back to the year 1913 when a radical journalist named
John Reed becomes enamored of Marx and the budding revolutionary movement in Russia.
The movie is long (very), talky, and annoying, but it fills in a gap in
our consensus history that tends to obscure the causes of American
reaction to FDR's New Deal and the red scares of the late forties and
fifties. To the extent that Warren Beatty is charming in this cri de coeur of his filmmaking
career, you can see the attraction of the naive and
hyper-intellectualized philosophy that annihilated Russia and came
close to paralyzing the United States of America. (clip)
No, it's not actually a good movie and it doesn't do anything like
justice to the book, but the book is so good and important that even a
sincere attempt to render it on film is nevertheless worth looking at.
What were the rich people doing in the wake of World War I and
international communism and the travails of labor, race, marxists, and
global nihilism? They were simply being their vast, careless selves.
Which is probably the source of today's liberal guilt. It would be easy
to recast the whole movie today -- we'd never go for Mia Farrow as
Daisy and probably not Robert Redford as Gatsby, but all the lesser
roles were spot on, including Bruce Dern as Tom Buchanan, Sam
Waterston as Nick Carraway, Karen Black as Mabel, Edward Hermann as FDR before the polio or some such thing, and Scott Wilson as
George Wilson, the man who shot Gatsby because his wife was sleeping
with Tom Buchanan. As I said, not a good movie, but it reminds us of
the book:
One afternoon late in October I saw Tom
Buchanan.
He was walking ahead of me along Fifth Avenue in his alert, aggressive
way, his hands out a little from his body as if to fight off
interference, his head moving sharply here and there, adapting itself
to his restless eyes. Just as I slowed up to avoid overtaking him he
stopped and began frowning into the windows of a jewelry store.
Suddenly he saw me and walked back, holding out his hand.
"What's the matter, Nick? Do you object to shaking hands with me?."
"Yes. You know what I think of you.." "You're crazy, Nick,." he said
quickly.
"Crazy as hell. I don't know what's the matter with you.." "Tom,." I
inquired, "what did you say to Wilson that afternoon?." He stared at me
without a word, and I knew I had guessed right about those missing
hours. I started to turn away, but he took a step after me and grabbed
my arm.
"I told him the truth,." he said.
"He came to the door while we were getting ready to leave, and when I
sent down word that we weren't in he tried to force his way up-stairs.
He was crazy enough to kill me if I hadn't told him who owned the car.
His hand was on a revolver in his pocket every minute he was in the
house - -." He broke off defiantly.
"What if I did tell him? That fellow had it coming to him. He threw
dust into your eyes just like he did in Daisy's, but he was a tough one.
He ran over Myrtle like you'd run over a dog and never even stopped his
car.." There was nothing I could say, except the one unutterable fact
that it wasn't true.
"And if you think I didn't have my share of suffering - look here, when
I went to give up that flat and saw that damn box of dog biscuits
sitting there on the sideboard, I sat down and cried like a baby.
By God it was awful - -." I couldn't forgive him or like him, but I saw
that what he had done was, to him, entirely justified. It was all very
careless and confused. They were careless people, Tom and Daisy - they
smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their
money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them
together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made....
I shook hands with him; it seemed silly not to, for I felt suddenly as
though I were talking to a child.
Which brings us, in American movie history, to the time of the Great
Crash.