September 28, 2008 - September 21, 2008
Friday, September 26, 2008
A Break in the
Key quote: "You know what? I'm the hero."
BE DEPRESSED. Yeah, everything's pretty dire this morning. A bank
overnight, stock market poised for another plunge, and congress torn
between passing a massive bailout package nobody wants and not passing a massive bailout
package everyone sort of knows is necessary. But's it's also a fine
moment. What must Obama be thinking about now? Isn't the clever young
fox always supposed to be more agile and energetic than the old dog
who's depicted in campaign ads as three-quarters in
the grave? But so
far, every time Obama thinks he's about to see daylight in the polls,
Senator McDroopy looks to have been a step ahead of him all along.
After the Berlin extravaganza, the obsolete old fleabag was waiting
back home with a truly deflating set of viral video ads comparing Obama
to Paris Hilton. After Obama's Roman Triumph in the Denver coliseum, he
marched grandly into the buzzsaw of the old hound's Palin gambit. And
now, blessed with the Democrat heaven of an economic crisis that can
be blamed on Republicans, Obama sprints out to the expected lead only
to find that damned old dog has beaten him to the headlines yet again.
Is McDroopy going to "surprise him like this through the whole
picture"? Your guess is as good as mine.
Okay. You are now free to resume being terrified and heartsick about
ROUND 2. I'm not going to name names, but Phillies pitcher Brett
Myers is the size of a house. When he waddles to the mound, the whole
ballpark shakes. The same goes for most of the rest of the staff. The
pictures in the video don't do them justice. They were probably taken
before the long season these guys have spent gorging out of sight
in the bullpen. I can only imagine the cornucopia of food behind the
screen -- like some medieval mead hall, no doubt, every trencherman
with his own leg of mutton and brace of turkeys washed down with a
hogshead of ale, every scraggly beard matted with grease and crumbs.
The banquet hall in the Phillies
It's a wonder anyone can hear the phone ring when Manager Charlie
Manuel calls from the dugout to ask one or more of them to push
themselves away from the table. Watching them warm up is like
witnessing a pod of whales stranded on some beach, heaving and snorting with painful effort.
Of course, eating yourself into a coma is a grand Philly tradition.
Every year, the city celebrates the bitter end of yet another failed
Eagles season with an event called the Wing
Bowl, which features the same combination of massive food intake
and bevies of buxom wenches. And only in Philadelphia could a major
league game be threatened with cancellation because of concerns about
the supply of hot
dogs. So I'm not dismissing the whole gluttony thing out of hand.
It has its place. But is that place really in the final stretch of a
breakneck pennant race?
Is it really an accident that the three best pitchers on the team
actually look like athletes?
But, as they say, the devil
is in the details. Here are a few of the loose ends they haven't quite
tied up to the satisfaction of what people in generations past would
have called 'science.' There isn't enough mass in the universe to
account for the way it operates. In fact, there isn't even half enough mass. Which physicists
have decided to explain by positing a thing they call dark matter,
which has never been seen because it's invisible and untraceable except
by negative inference; unless it's there, their model of the universe
doesn't make any sense. They have a similar problem with energy. There
appears to be too much of it, more than can be accounted for by their
assessments of where in the observable universe it might come
from. So they posit the existence of dark energy, which is just as
invisible and untraceable as dark matter.
Are you with us so far? Now, they have stumbled over another detail:
As if the mysteries of dark matter and
dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has
Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds
and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known
gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are
calling the phenomenon "dark flow."
The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable
universe, researchers conclude...
Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest
structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies.
These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as
well as very hot gas which emits X-rays....
They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2
million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of
Centaurus and Vela.
This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe
(which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).
"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity
does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky
told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot
produce the flow we measure."
The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the
clusters must lie beyond the known universe...
A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a
small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big
Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that
we cannot see.
In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely
doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the
particular density pattern of mass in our bubble).
It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in
our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers
suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.
Let's be clear about what they're conceding here. The mathematical
coherence of their cosmological model now depends on the existence of a permanently unknowableother-verse operating in accordance
with undefinably different laws of
physics. In other words, the only way our current cosmic logic remains logical is if we postulate a vast all-encompassing illogic we can never understand. (Was Moses really offering such a different deal?) They continue to call their formulations scientific. But casually incorporating metaphysics into physics proper without acknowledging the enormity of the leap entails its own kind of dark energy. They don't even have the good manners to wink as they execute their sleight of hand.
Fine. I'm not saying they're wrong. I'm just saying they've got a lot
of big, invisible, magical, and unequivocally theoretical balls in the
air that they have to keep juggling in the dark, so to speak, if they
are to prevent their "science" from shattering into the chaos of a
disastrous delusional fantasy. Dark matter. Dark energy. Dark flow.
These are hardly details. They're enormous unaccounted for remainders
in computations of cosmological long division that just aren't working
out the way they're supposed to. And what is their argument for the
existence of such immensely powerful forces and entities they've never
seen and therefore can't, ahem, observe and measure? They just have to be there, because the
scientists are pretty sure their basic theory about how the universe
operates is correct.
Funny, but I expect the person who would best understand that kind of a
logic-belief superposition is St. Thomas Aquinas. Given the belief, the
logic is impeccable. And given the logic, the belief is thoroughly
justified. It's called religion. Of course, this is a religion that is
unique in one regard; it infers no moral imperatives from the universe
it claims to understand so well.
I believe, though, that this
is a lack which can be easily remedied. Cosmological physics rests on
the observation of, thus far at least, four forces: gravity,
electro-magnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. It would
appear that our list of only three dark entities is one short of par.
Permit me to suggest a fourth. Dark
beams. These are lines of exceptionally powerful energy so
finely concentrated that they are presently undetectable, hence
invisible or "dark." But, just like the physicists, we can still prove
they are there because of the well documented phenomenon of answered
prayers. Dark beams arc across the universe to and from the elegant
conjunction of dark matter, dark energy, and dark flow that scientists
'know' continuously alters the behavior of the physical (i.e., visible
and observable) universe. We see dark beams at work when the
routine predictions of science are confounded -- a brain-dead coma
victim recovers, a hard-bitten fireman swears an angel protected him
from immolation and led him impossibly to safety, the brief life of one
man in a conquered province overthrows an empire and afterwards sets in
motion the greatest explosion in the development of human imagination,
knowledge, thought, creativity, and freedom in history..
These are not outcomes that can be explained by hard science or all the
latter-day disciplines which claim to be sciences. They are the product
of dark beams, which will one day make possible a unified "dark theory"
which demonstrates that nothing works without the constant interaction
between the raw physicality science seeks to measure and the much
greater invisible aphysicality that sustains and makes sense of
itself. And dark beams are the only shortcut that connects the physical universe directly with the aphysical universe. Hence the human association, throughout all the ages of of our species, of dark beams with the concept of the "divine."
Don't like it? Disprove it. In all likelihood, there's probably more
voluminous evidence for my dark beams than for your dark matter, dark
energy, and dark flows. And consider this: How scientific would all their formulations sound, particularly in the context of religion, if rather than "dark," they used as their preferred term "the unseen"?
. The maestro is in the news a couple of ways this week. First,
it seems there's been a rediscovery of a lost
manuscript: Predictably, it's being used to make lesser men feel
What's fascinating about this sheet of
manuscript is not what light it sheds on Mozart's existing
masterpieces, but rather that it joins the hundred or so strong
catalogue of unfinished drafts by Mozart. Unlike the legend, the real
Wolfgang didn't always take musical dictation from God. Instead, he
tried out ideas, rejecting some along the way, experimenting with his
material until he found the right notes that would make the composition
flow. Much of this working, there's no doubt, was done in his head or
at the piano, so what makes this document so precious is that it is a
physical reminder of Mozart's compositional humanity. What's more, it
probably dates from Mozart's last years (the watermark suggests
somewhere between 1787 and 1791, the year of his death).
say it's definitely his handwriting. Human handwriting. Hah.
Nobody can play the music yet, because he left out information like the
key and so forth that mere mortals have to have before they can
orchestrate a deathless doodle.
Second, there's news about the long-disputed skull
currently in the possession of an Austrian foundation. We may soon have
a better idea about whether it belonged to Wolfgang or somebody else..
DNA Tests to Be Performed on
VIENNA, Austria - DNA tests could soon solve a century-old mystery —
whether a skull held by the International Mozarteum Foundation is that
of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.
Archaeologists have opened a grave in Salzburg thought to contain the
remains of Mozart's father and other relatives. Experts plan to compare
the remains' genetic material with the foundation's skull to determine
if it belonged to the famed Austrian composer. Mozart died in 1791 and
was buried in a pauper's grave at Vienna's St. Marxer Cemetery. The
location of the grave was initially unknown, but its likely location
was determined in 1855. The grave on that spot is adorned by a column
and a sad-looking angel.
The scuttlebutt has it that the gravedigger who buried Mozart
subsequently stole his skull and sold it. Scientists have managed to
procure the thighbone of an aunt to use it in DNA comparisons. We'll
Scientists are never satisfied, of course. Without their dumb tests,
they're adrift. It doesn't matter that jettisoned body parts have served as soothsayers to millions over the years, capable of
answering every "yes or no" question put to them.
Oh? You doubt it? Then give it a try. Frame your question and prepare
to hear the voice of the greatest genius yet born in the -- what d'you
call it? -- Common Era?
. Frankly, we can't make out many of the details in what's
going on out there. All that's clear is that everyone's involved and
everyone's getting dirty. Anyone who can decipher some real highlights
of the action is free to offer them in the Comment section. I'm not
even going to try.
Meanwhile, gas prices keep going up, the financial system keeps melting
down, people on the gulf coast are still mired in mud of their own,
Pakistan is imploding, Iran is toiling away nonstop on its atom bomb,
our own leftist loons are applauding Ahdumjihad for blaming the U.S.
financial crisis on the War in Iraq, and tragically, Horatio
Caine is not really dead. (Bret Favre and the Jets, on the other hand, just might be.)
I'm sure all the campaign geniuses know what they're doing and why it's better than acting like a grownup. Maybe
they'll explain it all to us one day. Until then, here's the best
advice a lone blogger can give you.
Things will get better. They do that. Sometimes they do. But not CSI Miami.
Thank God we can trust the government
to look out for us, you know? It wasn't always this way. Here's
something of a prophecy from nearly 20 years ago. It's from The
Boomer Bible. Which continues to be right about a lot
And so it will come to pass that the
American Capitalists will invent industries that nobody ever heard of
2 Called management consulting,
3 And public relations,
4 And life insurance,
5 Not to mention advertising,
6 Which won't make anything at all,
7 But they'll be very well paid for not making anything at all,
8 Just like banks.
And since they've come up, it's
important for you to know that banks will be an incredibly important
part of Capitalist societies like America,
2 Because every Capitalist nation will always need a whole bunch
of boring avaricious people in blue suits to watch everybody's money,
3 Because the most important principle in every Capitalist Nation
is the principle that nobody can be trusted,
5 Except for banks, of course,
6 Which are extremely trustworthy,
7 Or why would they have so many boring drones in blue suits to
watch over your money all the time?
8 Besides, if banks weren't trustworthy, why would people give
them money and let them lend it to other people,
9 Without even asking the people who gave it to them in the first
10 Not to mention the fact that if bankers weren't trustworthy,
they'd probably get involved in a lot of risky financial speculation
that could cause a huge depression someday,
11 Which wouldn't do Capitalism any good at all.
That's why it will be such a good thing
that banks will always lend money to the people who deserve it,
2 And will always use impeccable business judgment,
3 Because who could possibly know more about business than a
know-it-all in a blue suit who thinks you earn money by lending other
people's money to still other people who will do all the work and take
all the risks,
4 While he sits in a giant office upstairs at the bank thinking
up ways to get more money?
Eventually, there will be so many great
bankers that they will build a city all for themselves,
2 Called New York,
3 Which nobody will be allowed into who actually makes things,
4 Except skyscrapers, that is,
5 Because the banks and life insurance companies and brokerage
houses who deal strictly in money will all need their own skyscrapers,
6 With their names on them in giant letters,
7 Just so everyone will know that they really do make things,
8 Even though they really don't,
9 Which has a lot to do with the appearance of value,
10 And everything in the world to do with American Capitalism,
11 Which will have its headquarters in New York,
12 On Wall Street.
In fact, Wall Street will become the
world capital of Capitalism,
2 And will become so fantastically successful that the people who
work there will eventually forget practically everything you ever said,
3 Because they will know better than you,
4 About everything.
For example, they will forget about all your quaint definitions,
2 Because Capitalism isn't about creating wealth by creating
value that didn't exist before;
3 Instead, it's about getting rich by getting hold of more money
than other people,
4 Which is why value doesn't matter,
5 Since what really matters is being the swiftest,
6 And the fittest,
7 And getting up earlier than the other guy,
8 So that you can take his money while he's still asleep,
9 And use it to buy stocks on margin,
10 In the kinds of companies that can't help but succeed,
11 Which you can always identify because their stock prices keep
12 Which is why everybody else is buying their stocks on margin
13 And so it's a good idea to buy yours earlier than the other
14 So that you'll make higher profits,
15 And more money.
Actually (said the pen),
2 I have some not very good news for you,
3 Because when I told you the bad news about your ideas before,
4 I overlooked some,
5 Which I have been suddenly reminded of,
6 Because Capitalism will also lead to something really awful
that people will blame on you,
7 Something called the Great Depression,
8 Which will start on Wall Street,
9 With a tremendous noise,
10 Which will sound like a single gigantic crash,
11 Even though it will consist of thousands and thousands of
12 Made by thousands and thousands of phones slipping from
13 All over America,
15 Because the call they all got,
17 Was a margin call.
During the Great Depression, it will become obvious to everyone that
Capitalism doesn't work,
2 Because millions and millions of people will be out of work,
3 And even worse than that, it will be discovered that there
isn't any money at all in the Most Chosen Nation,
4 Except for the money that the richest of the fat-cat
Capitalists still have squirreled away, of course,
5 Because all the money everybody else had before the Great
Depression was borrowed from somebody else,
6 Who had also borrowed it from somebody else,
7 And so forth,
8 And so on,
9 So that there's only one thing left to do,
10 Namely, have the government step in,
11 And print up a whole bunch of money,
12 And start giving it away,
13 Which doesn't have much to do with Capitalism exactly,
14 But has a great deal to do with putting some food on the table,
15 For all the millions and millions of people who aren't fit
enought to survive on their own.
In fact, this new idea of giving money away to the people who need it
will catch on,
2 In a big way,
3 And become very very popular,
4 Because the politicans will look very statesmanlike giving away
5 While the philanthropists will look miserly giving away their
6 Which is why the government will be delighted to discover how
easy it is to take more and more millions away from the philanthropists,
7 So that they can have their picture taken giving it away,
8 Until lots and lots of people in the Most Chosen Nation on
Earth will one day decide that they were wrong for all the years they
thought it was the government who couldn't be trusted the most,
9 Because the ones who can't be trusted the most are the greedy
10 Who borrowed all that money,
11 And then threw it all away.
Here endeth today's lesson. Unless you're prepared to consider even
that InstaPunk is always right.
Nah. You don't want to do that. Think about Hope and Change instead.
Time capsule moment. If you follow the "InstaPunk is always right"
link, note that while I anticipated a Hillary nomination, I also
suggested the electorate might be in the mood for a "super-smart"
candidate. Isn't that really the basis of the Obama campaign? No
experience. No accomplishments. No plans to speak of. But he's just
"super-smart." Newt would have taken him apart in three debates. (And I mean
absolutely nothing left
moving on the field of battle larger than a toe...) But read the comments on
that post. Everyone telling me I was wrong because they just knew conservatives had to bend
their principles this time for the sake of getting elected. And the
commenters weren't alone. Somewhat later
in the day I crossed swords with Weekly
Standard wunderkind Dean Barnett, who still hasn't regained any
credibility after his long infatuation with Mitt Romney. When you look
at just how nasty this campaign is getting, does anyone really think
Mitt's sunny banality would play with the negative ads he'd have to be running by now?
So there's a second lesson of
the day. Conservatives blew it this time, Because they had no guts.
Their convictions and principles weren't proof against their fears and
their media-induced anxiousness to compromise on issues that -- as I predicted
-- would no longer be the determining factors in the 2008 election. The
bad news? We may very well get ZERObama
for president. That's an outcome that could have been avoided with a
show of character by all you 'pragmatic' Romney, Giuliani, Thompson,
and McCain supporters. (Peter: Don't you dare. Ron Paul was never a
candidate; he was always only a badly written fictional character, Eugene McCarthy rewritten as a graphic novel for for the solipsistic I-pod
Disgusted. Yeah, I'm voting McCain. But I'm still d-i-s-g-u-s-t-e-d.